Philosophy · 5 minutes

Your effort does not explain all your success.

You know your effort from within. The other causes of an achievement rarely appear with the same clarity.

You know your effort better than anyone else. You know how many hours you worked, how often you carried on while tired, which risks you took, and what certain decisions cost you. These experiences were recorded because you lived them. Effort has an advantage over almost every other cause in your journey: you can feel it from within.

The conditions that helped that effort produce results do not appear in the same way. A country’s stability does not draw your attention while it remains stable. Infrastructure that works seems merely part of the world. The absence of an illness creates no memory. A favorable decision made by someone else may reach you without your knowing everything that led them to make it. Many important causes take part in our lives without requiring us to notice their presence.

This creates an inevitable difference in the way we tell our own stories. What we did occupies the center because we know its details. Everything else appears as scenery. We remember the night we kept working, but not the thousands of days when nothing prevented us from working. We remember preparing for an opportunity, but may know very little about the circumstances that made that opportunity exist at precisely that moment.

That is why effort and outcome seem so naturally linked. You look at what you achieved and immediately find an obvious cause: you worked for it. And you did. The problem is not acknowledging effort, but allowing what we know best to be confused with everything that actually contributed to the outcome.

A person may have been disciplined, competent, and persistent and still have depended on conditions they never fully noticed. Some were external, others came from the decisions of people with lives of their own, and others simply remained stable long enough. None of this turns the individual into a spectator of their own journey. It only shows that being the protagonist does not mean being the only cause.

Our memory records what we did very well. It is much worse at recording everything that allowed what we did to work.

Your effort explains an important part of your story. Being the part you know best does not mean it is the whole story.

You Were Just Lucky explores how far our authorship over our achievements really extends: what belongs to effort, choices, and competence, and what depends on conditions we did not choose, people we do not control, events we did not foresee, and even things that never happened.

It is not an attempt to deny merit or reduce our achievements to luck. It is an invitation to look more carefully at the story we tell about ourselves — and ask how much of it really began with us.

Discover the book